Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are approved for use in the US by the FDA for the treatments outlined in the table below.1-14 Ramipril (Altace) is also approved to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes.13
Table 1: FDA approved ACE inhibitor use
Drug Name (Brand Name)
|
Hypertension
|
Heart Failure
|
Left Ventricular Dysfunction After MI
|
Acute MI
|
Diabetic Nephropathy
|
Stable Coronary Artery Disease
|
Benazepril (Lotensin)
|
✓
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captopril (Capoten*)
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
✓
|
|
Enalapril oral solution (Epaned)
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
|
|
Enalapril (Vasotec)
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
|
|
Enalaprilat injection (Vasotec injection)
|
✓
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fosinopril (Monopril*)
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
|
|
|
Lisinopril oral solution (Qbrelis)
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
✓
|
|
|
Lisinopril (Prinivil*)
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
✓
|
|
|
Lisinopril (Zestril)
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
✓
|
|
|
Moexipril (Univasc*)
|
✓
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perindopril (Aceon*)
|
✓
|
|
|
|
|
✓
|
Quinapril (Accupril)
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
|
|
|
Ramipril (Altace)
|
✓
|
✓**
|
|
|
|
|
Trandolapril (Mavik*)
|
✓
|
✓**
|
✓
|
|
|
|
*Brand names with asterisks beside them have been discontinued in the US. The generic versions of these drugs continue to be FDA approved and are available in the US.
**Ramipril and trandolapril are approved to treat heart failure following myocardial infarction.
Hypertension
The 2017 hypertension guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) list ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and thiazide diuretics as the primary agents used in the treatment of hypertension (Class of Recommendation I, Level of Evidence A).*15
ACE inhibitors can help prevent death and MIs in hypertensive patients. A meta-analysis of 106 randomized trials sought to compare the efficacy and safety of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in patients with hypertension without heart failure (HF). The results showed that compared with placebo, ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduced the outcomes of all-cause mortality (7.1% vs 7.8% placebo, absolute risk reduction 0.7% p=0.001), cardiovascular death (4.1% vs 4.7%, absolute risk reduction 0.6%, p<0.001), and MI (4.8% vs 5.7%, absolute risk reduction 0.9%, p=0.02).16
Heart Disease
The 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines recommend:
- Adults with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) and hypertension (BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg) should be treated with ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or beta blockers as first-line therapy (Class of Recommendation I, Level of Evidence B-Randomized).
- Adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and persistent hypertension after management of volume overload should be prescribed ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta blockers titrated to attain a systolic BP of less than 130 mm Hg (Class of Recommendation I, Level of Evidence C- Expert Opinion).
- For adults who experience a stroke or transient ischemic attack, treatment with an ACE inhibitor, ARB, or thiazide diuretic is useful (Class of Recommendation I, Level of Evidence A).
- In adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension, all first-line classes of antihypertensive agents including ACE inhibitors, ARBS, CCBs, and diuretics are useful and effective (Class of Recommendation I, Level of Evidence A). 15
ACE inhibitors lower the risk of developing HF (29.8% vs 38.6% placebo, absolute risk reduction 8.8%, p<0.001), reduce mortality associated with HF (35.2% vs 39.7% placebo, absolute risk reduction 4.5%, p=0.0036), and reduce hospitalizations associated with HR (47.7% vs 57.3% placebo, absolute risk reduction 9.6%, p<0.0001).16,17
The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study (HOPE) followed a total of 9297 high-risk patients (55 years of age or older) who had evidence of vascular disease or diabetes plus one other cardiovascular risk factor and who were not known to have a low ejection fraction or HF. Intervention with an ACE inhibitor resulted in lower rates of death from cardiovascular causes (6.1% vs 8.1% placebo, absolute risk reduction 2%, p<0.001), MI (9.9% vs 12.3% placebo, absolute risk reduction 2.4%, p<0.001), stroke (3.4% vs 4.9% placebo, absolute risk reduction 1.5%, p<0.001), death from any cause (10.4% vs 12.2% placebo, absolute risk reduction 1.8%, p=0.005), revascularization procedures (16.0% vs 18.3%, absolute risk reduction 2.3%, p=0.002), cardiac arrest (0.8% vs 1.3%, absolute risk reduction 0.5%, p=0.03), HF (9.0% vs 11.5%, absolute risk reduction 2.5%, p<0.001), and complications related to diabetes (6.4% vs 7.6%, absolute risk reduction 2.2%, p=0.03).18
HF management guidelines recommend the inhibition of angiotensin by an ACE inhibitor or ARB as a key component of the treatment plan for people with hypertension and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).19-22
Kidney Disease
The 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines say that in adults with hypertension and chronic kidney disease (stage 3 or higher; or stage 1 or 2 with albuminuria [≥300 mg/d, or ≥300 mg/g albumin-to-creatinine ratio or the equivalent in the first morning void]), treatment with an ACE inhibitor is reasonable to slow kidney disease progression (Class of Recommendation IIa, Level of Evidence B-Randomized).15
The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) recommends that an ACE inhibitor or ARB be used:
- In diabetic adults with CKD and urine albumin excretion 30-300 mg/24 hours (or equivalent) (2D**)
- In both diabetic and non-diabetic adults with CKD and urine albumin excretion >300 mg/24 hours (or equivalent) (1B**)
- In children with CKD in whom treatment with BP-lowering drugs is indicated, irrespective of the level of proteinuria (2D**) 23
ACE inhibitors protect against deterioration in renal function in insulin-dependent diabetic nephropathy. In a study of 409 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in whom urinary protein excretion was ≥500 mg per day and the serum creatinine concentration was ≤2.5 mg per deciliter (221 μmol per liter), serum creatinine concentrations doubled in 12.1% of the intervention group vs 21.3% of the placebo group (absolute risk reduction 9.2%, p=0.007). The mean rate of increase in serum creatinine at follow-up (average 2.7 years) in the patients in the intervention group was 0.2 ±0.8 mg per deciliter per year (22 ±67 μmol per liter per year) vs 0.5 ±0.8 mg per deciliter per year (42 ±67 μmol per liter per year) in the placebo group (p=0.004). The use of ACE inhibitors reduced death, dialysis, or renal transplantation (11.1% vs 20.8% placebo, absolute risk reduction 9.7%, p=0.006).24
*See ACC/AHA Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence definitions below:
Class (Strength) of Recommendation
|
Class I (Strong)
|
Benefit >>>> Risk
|
Suggested phrases for writing recommendations:
· Is recommended
· Is indicated/useful/effective/beneficial
· Should be performed/administered/other
· Comparative-Effectiveness Phrases:
· Treatment/strategy A is recommended/indicated in preference to treatment B
· Treatment A should be chosen over treatment B
|
Class IIa (Moderate)
|
Benefit >> Risk
|
Suggested phrases for writing recommendations:
· Is reasonable
· Can be useful/effective/beneficial
· Comparative-Effectiveness Phrases:
· Treatment/strategy A is probably recommended/indicated in preference to treatment B
· It is reasonable to choose treatment A over treatment B
|
Class IIb (Weak)
|
Benefit ≥ Risk
|
Suggested phrases for writing recommendations:
· May/might be reasonable
· May/might be considered
· Usefulness/effectiveness is unknown/unclear/uncertain or not well established
|
Class III: No Benefit (Moderate)
(Generally LOE A or B use only)
|
Benefit = Risk
|
Suggested phrases for writing recommendations:
· Is not recommended
· Is not indicated/useful/effective/beneficial
· Should not be performed/administered/other
|
Class III: Harm (Strong)
|
Risk > Benefit
|
Suggested phrases for writing recommendations:
· Potentially harmful
· Causes harm
· Associated with excess morbidity/mortality
· Should not be performed/administered/other
|
Level (Quality) of Evidence
|
Level A
|
|
· High-quality evidence from more than 1 randomized control trial (RCT)
· Meta-analyses of high quality RCTs
· One or more RCTs corroborated by high-quality registry studies
|
Level B-R
|
(Randomized)
|
· Moderate-quality evidence from 1 or more RCTs
· Meta-analyses of moderate-quality RCTs
|
Level B-NR
|
(Nonrandomized)
|
· Moderate-quality evidence from 1 or more well-designed, well-executed nonrandomized studies, observational studies, or registry studies
· Meta-analyses of such studies
|
Level C-LD
|
(Limited Data)
|
· Randomized or nonrandomized observational or registry studies with limitations of design or execution
· Meta-analyses of such studies
· Physiological or mechanistic studies on human subjects
|
Level C-EO
|
(Expert Opinion)
|
· Consensus of expert opinion based on clinical experience
|
**See KDIGO grade for overall quality of evidence and description for grading recommendations below:
Grade
|
Quality of evidence
|
Meaning
|
A
|
High
|
We are confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
|
B
|
Moderate
|
The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
|
C
|
Low
|
The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
|
D
|
Very low
|
The estimate of effect is very uncertain, and often will be far form the truth.
|
|
Implications
|
Grade*
|
Patients
|
Clinicians
|
Policy
|
Level 1
“We recommend”
|
Most people in your situation would want the recommended course of action and only a small proportion would not.
|
Most patients should receive the recommended course of action.
|
The recommendation can be evaluated as a candidate for developing a policy or performance measure.
|
Level 2
“We suggest”
|
The majority of people in your situation would want the recommended course of action, but many would not.
|
Different choices will be appropriate for different patients. Each patient needs help to arrive at a management decision consistent with her or his values and preferences.
|
The recommendation is likely to require substantial de4bate and involvement of stakeholders before policy can be determined.
|
*The additional category “Not Graded” was used, typically, to provide guidance based on common sense or where the topic does not allow adequate application of evidence. The most common examples include recommendations regarding monitoring intervals, counseling, and referral to other clinical specialists. The ungraded recommendations are generally written as declarative statements, but are not meant to be interpreted as being stronger recommendations than Level 1 or 2 recommendations.
References
- Lotensin [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Validus Pharmaceuticals LLC; 2019.
- Capoten [package insert]. Chestnut Ridge, NY: Par Pharmaceutical; 2017.
- Epaned [package insert]. Wilmington, MA: Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2020.
- Vasotec [package insert]. Bridgewater, NJ: Bausch Health US LLC; 2018.
- Enalaprilat [package insert]. Lake Forest, IL: Hospira, Inc.; 2021.
- Monopril [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2003.
- Qbrelis [package insert]. Wilmington, MA: Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2020.
- Prinivil [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.; 2021.
- Zestril [package insert]. Morristown, NJ: Almatica Pharma LLC; 2020.
- Univasc [package insert]. Smyrna, GA: USB, Inc; 2012.
- Aceon [package insert]. Cincinnati, OH: Patheon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2017.
- Accupril [package insert]. New York, NY: Parke Davis, Pfizer; 2021.
- Altace [package insert]. New York, NY: Pfizer Laboratories; 2022.
- Mavik [package insert]. Whippany, NJ: Halo Pharmaceutical Inc.; 2017.
- Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults. Hypertension 2017.
- Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions: the SOLVD Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327:685–691.
- Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure: the SOLVD Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:293–302.
- Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G.Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:145–153.
- Bangalore S, Fakheri R, Toklu B, Ogedegbe G, Weintraub H, Messerli FH. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in patients without heart failure? Insights from 254,301 patients from randomized trials. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91 (1): 51-60.
- Rosendorff C, Lackland DT, Allison M, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients with coronary artery disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Society of Hypertension. Circulation 2015; 131 (19): e435-470.
- Unger T. The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the development of cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89 (2a): 3A-9A; discussion 10A.
- Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update on new pharmacological therapy for heart failure: an update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68 (13): 1476-1488.
- KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl (2011) 2013; 3 (1): i-150.
- Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy: the Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:1456–1462.